Contact Us
Archives
Categories
- Fractional Investment
- Section 1031 transactions
- Investment
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Lenders
- Arbitration
- Breach
- Closing
- Closing Disclosure
- Good Faith Estimate
- HUD-1 Settlement Statement
- Truth in Lending Act
- “Know Before You Owe”
- Condemnation
- Zoning Regulations
- Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECMs)
- Reverse mortgages
- Dodd-Frank Act
- Mortgage
- Real Estate Law
- Commercial Real Estate
- Land Use Law
- Planning and Zoning
- Purchase Contract
- Affordable Housing
- Economic Development
- Landlord
- Lease
- Property Titling
- Rescission
- Same-Sex Couples
- Tenant
- URLTA
- Homeowners Association
- Deed
- Land Surveys
- plat
- Property Lines
- Property Survey
- Agritourism
- Drones
- National Association of Realtors (NAR)
- Real Estate Agents
- Rural Areas
- Condominium
- Deeds
- Horizontal Property Law
- Kentucky Condominium Act
- LBAR
- Loans
- Overlay Zoning
- Steenrod v. Louisville Yacht Club Association
- Title Insurance Policies
- Trulia
- Uncategorized
- Zillow
- Co-Signing
- Commercial Lease
- Emergency Preparedness
- Emotional Support Animals
- Exclusive Use Clause
- Insurance Companies
- Insured
- KRS 383.500
- Natural Disasters
- Benningfield v. Zinmeister
- Boards of Adjustment
- Building Inspection
- Code Enforcement
- Conditional uses
- Dog owners
- ESIGN
- Federal Housing Administration (FHA)
- Inspection
- KRS §258.235(4)
- KRS §383.580
- Multi-unit properties
- Occupancy Fraud
- Screening
- Security Deposit
- Servicers
- The Loan Estimate form
- Truth in Lending Statement
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
- Variances
- Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
- "Right-of-Way Agents"
- Bluegrass Pipeline
- Boilerplate Language
- Conservation Easement
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”)
- Credit Report
- Credit Score
- Easement
- Eminent Domain
- FICO
- General Forms
- Homebuyers
- Kentucky landowners
- Power of Attorney ("POA")
Showing 1 post in U.S. Supreme Court.
Regulatory Takings Cases and the Relevant Parcel: Murr v. Wisconsin
This summer, in Murr v. Wisconsin,[1] the United States Supreme Court will make an important decision on property rights and regulatory takings under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. At issue in the case is whether two legally distinct parcels of land can be treated as one for regulatory purposes if they share common ownership. In a time when planning and zoning regulations change sporadically, this case has broad implications for owners of commercial property, farmers, developers, mining operations and others that hold legal title to adjoining properties, so these groups should pay particular attention to this case.
[1] Murr v. Wisconsin, 359 Wisc. 2d 675 (Wis. App. 2014), rev. denied, 862 N.W.2d 899 (Wis. 2015) More >