Contact Us
Categories
- Kentucky Consumer Protection Act
- Judgment creditors
- Fractional Investment
- Section 1031 transactions
- Investment
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Arbitration
- Breach
- Closing
- Closing Disclosure
- Good Faith Estimate
- HUD-1 Settlement Statement
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Lenders
- Minimum wage
- Truth in Lending Act
- “Know Before You Owe”
- Condemnation
- Dodd-Frank Act
- Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECMs)
- Mortgage
- Real Estate Law
- Reverse mortgages
- Zoning Regulations
- Affordable Housing
- Commercial Real Estate
- Economic Development
- Land Use Law
- Landlord
- Lease
- Planning and Zoning
- Property Titling
- Purchase Contract
- Rescission
- Same-Sex Couples
- Tenant
- URLTA
- Agritourism
- Deed
- Drones
- Homeowners Association
- Land Surveys
- LBAR
- National Association of Realtors (NAR)
- Plat
- Property Lines
- Property Survey
- Real Estate Agents
- Rural Areas
- Trulia
- Zillow
- Boards of Adjustment
- Co-Signing
- Commercial Lease
- Conditional uses
- Condominium
- Deeds
- Emergency Preparedness
- Emotional Support Animals
- ESIGN
- Exclusive Use Clause
- Federal Housing Administration (FHA)
- Horizontal Property Law
- Insurance Companies
- Insured
- Kentucky Condominium Act
- KRS 383.500
- Loans
- Multi-unit properties
- Natural Disasters
- Occupancy Fraud
- Overlay Zoning
- Screening
- Servicers
- Steenrod v. Louisville Yacht Club Association
- Title Insurance Policies
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
- Uncategorized
- Variances
- "Right-of-Way Agents"
- Benningfield v. Zinmeister
- Bluegrass Pipeline
- Boilerplate Language
- Building Inspection
- Code Enforcement
- Conservation Easement
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”)
- Credit Report
- Credit Score
- Dog owners
- Easement
- Eminent Domain
- FICO
- General Forms
- Homebuyers
- Inspection
- Kentucky landowners
- KRS §258.235(4)
- KRS §383.580
- Power of Attorney ("POA")
- Security Deposit
- The Loan Estimate form
- Truth in Lending Statement
- Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
Showing 1 post in U.S. Supreme Court.
Regulatory Takings Cases and the Relevant Parcel: Murr v. Wisconsin
This summer, in Murr v. Wisconsin,[1] the United States Supreme Court will make an important decision on property rights and regulatory takings under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. At issue in the case is whether two legally distinct parcels of land can be treated as one for regulatory purposes if they share common ownership. In a time when planning and zoning regulations change sporadically, this case has broad implications for owners of commercial property, farmers, developers, mining operations and others that hold legal title to adjoining properties, so these groups should pay particular attention to this case.
[1] Murr v. Wisconsin, 359 Wisc. 2d 675 (Wis. App. 2014), rev. denied, 862 N.W.2d 899 (Wis. 2015) More >