Contact Us
Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Join us on LinkedInCategories
- Corporate and Business Tax
- Small Business
- Tax Incentives
- Taxation
- Human Resource Department
- Non-exempt employees
- Horse Racing
- Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority
- Employment Law
- Healthcare Regulation
- Hospitality and Tourism Law
- Income Tax
- Kentucky general assembly
- Legislation
- Legislative Developments
- Alcoholic Beverage Control Laws
- Hospitality
- Estate Planning
- Lease
- Small Claims
- Tenant
- Agriculture
- Banking
- Hemp
- Defense Attorneys
- Family Businesses
- Federal Election Campaign Act
- Insurance Defense
- Medical Review Panel
- Political Action Committee (PAC)
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Malpractice Litigation
- Equine law
- House Bill 33
- Kentucky Equine Liability
- Kentucky Residents Rights Act
- KRS 216.515
- Legal Insight and Litigation
- Bankruptcy
- Health Care Law
- Health Resource and Services Administration
- Academy of Model Aeronautics
- Drones
- FAA Modernization Act of 2012
- Professional Liability Cases
- Small UAS Rule
- Bad Faith Claims
- Hospitals
- Insurance Coverage
- Mediation
- Mediation Services
- Kentucky Motor Vehicle Reparations Act
- Kentucky No Fault Insurance
- Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
- Medical Malpractice
- Patient Safety Systems
- Personal Injury Protection
- Professional Liability Risk
- Professional Malpractice
- Warranty
- Corporate
- Diversity
- Dog owners
- Landlord
- Litigation
- Malicious Prosecution
- Municipal Liability
- Real Estate Law
- Business Entities
- Business Formation and Planning
Showing 1 post tagged Americold Realty Trust v. ConAgra Foods.
Supreme Court Upholds Strict Diversity of Citizenship of Non-Corporate Entities for Diversity Jurisdiction
Posted In Business Entities, Business Formation and Planning
In a unanimous decision on March 7, 2016, the United States Supreme Court affirmed its longstanding principle that unincorporated entities cannot claim diversity jurisdiction for federal court purposes. This case highlights the striking differences between corporations and other entities, and provides a roadmap for how major unincorporated entities are viewed by the federal court system. More >
