Lobbying Affiliate: MML&K Government Solutions
{ Banner Image }

Legal Insight and Litigation

when you want a lawyer who’s not going to be
all lawyer-y about it.

Contact Us

250 Character(s) Remaining
Type the following characters: foxtrot, november, six, three, tango, hotel

* Indicates a required field.

McBrayer Blogs

How to Share the Road: Kentucky New Law Strives to Make Roadways Safer for Cyclists

In an effort to promote the safety of cyclists using the Commonwealth’s roadways, the Kentucky General Assembly recently imposed new duties on drivers. On March 29, 2018, Governor Bevin signed into law House Bill 33, entitled “An ACT relating to the overtaking of bicycles on a roadway.”  The Act, which amended KRS 189.300-.340, became effective on July 14, 2018.  Over thirty states have enacted similar laws.[1]     

The law provides that drivers overtaking bicyclists must follow certain rules depending upon the location of the encounter. On a roadway with “more than one (1) lane for traffic proceeding in the same direction,” the driver must move to his or her vehicle to the “immediate left, if the lane is available and moving in the lane is reasonably safe.”[2]  When on a roadway with “only one (1) lane for traffic proceeding in the same direction,” the driver is required to “pass to the left of the bicycle at a distance of not less than three (3) feet between any portion of the vehicle and the bicycle and maintain that distance until safely past the overtaken bicycle.”[3]  The statute does permit drivers to “drive to the left of the center of a roadway” in a no-passing zone as long as “the roadway to the left of the center is unobstructed for a sufficient distance to permit the driver to pass the person operating the bicycle safely and avoid interference with oncoming traffic.”[4]

The law also imposes new duties on bicyclists sharing the roadway. Specifically, cyclists “shall not ride more than two (2) abreast on a single highway lane unless operating on any part of the roadway marked exclusively for bicycle use.”[5]  Further, any cyclists “riding two (2) abreast shall not impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic.”[6] 

Not only is a person who violates the law potentially subject to a criminal fine, but he or she may also be at risk for civil liability for personal injury and property damage resulting from the violation.  A violation of the statute, like violations of most other traffic regulations, can likely form the basis, or a partial basis, for a lawsuit against the driver.[7]  A person seeking to recover damages for a violation of the law, however, will still need to prove that the violation was a substantial factor in causing the injuries or damage[8] and will be subject to a reduction of his or her monetary damages if he or she also violated the statute or was otherwise at fault.[9]  It should be noted that the new law does leave room for driver discretion.  For example, a driver passing a cyclist on a one-lane roadway where there is insufficient space to do so within the three-foot minimum is directed to “use reasonable caution.”[10]  Ultimately, whether a driver exercised discretion in a reasonable manner is a question to be resolved by the factfinder (judge or jury).

The effect of the law on Kentucky civil cases is yet to be seen and will be illuminated as the law is employed by plaintiffs and defendants—and considered by judges and juries—in the courts.  In any event, it is the sincere hope of this author that the law makes the Commonwealth a safer place for cyclists and drivers alike.    

Services may be performed by others.

This article does not constitute legal advice.

Jack Brammer, Don’t drive too close to that bike!  This new Kentucky law is now in effect., The Lexington Herald-Leader (July 13, 2018, 11:30 a.m.), https://www.kentucky.com/news/state/article214752740.html.

[2] KRS 189.340(2)(a)(1).

[3] KRS 189.340(2)(a)(2). 

[4] KRS 189.340(2)(b). 

[5] KRS 189.340(2)(c).

[6] Id.

[7] KRS 446.070; Alderman v. Bradley, 957 S.W.2d 264, 267 (Ky.App.1997); Ferguson v. Undertow Trucking, Inc., No. 2011–CA–000064–MR, 2011 WL 6743337 (Ky. 2011) (unpublished).

[8] Lewis v. B&R Corp., 56 S.W.3d 432, 438 (Ky.App. 2001).

[9] KRS 411.182; Hargis v. Baize, 168 S.W.3d 36, 46 (Ky. 2005). 

[10] KRS 189.340(2)(a)(2). 

Lexington, KYLouisville, KYFrankfort, KYFrankfort, KY: MML&K Government Solutions