Contact Us
Categories
- SCOTUS
- Overtime
- Overtime Rule
- Federal Trade Commission
- FTC
- Service Animals
- Remote Work
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Minors
- Work from Home
- Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
- COVID-19
- Workplace health
- Intellectual Property
- Trade Secrets
- Worker Misclassification
- FMLA Retaliation
- Non-exempt employees
- Wage and Hour
- ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (“ADAAA”)
- Adverse Employment Action
- Civil Rights
- Compliance
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- EEOC
- Employee Handbook
- Employee Misconduct
- Employment Law
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- Independent Contractors
- National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- Social Media
- Social Media Policies
- Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
- U.S. Department of Labor
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”)
- Union
- Employer Group Health Plans
- HIPAA
- Telecommuting
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Employee Training
- Federal Department of Labor
- Kentucky Wage and Hour Act
- At-will employment
- Criminal Background Checks
- Employee Benefits
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Government employees
- Litigation
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Online Defamation
- Paid Time Off ("PTO")
- Payroll
- Pension Plans
- Reference checks
- Severance Pay
- Supervisor
- Tangible employment actions
- Title VII retaliation cases
- Crisis Management
- Employment Practices Liability Insurance
- OSHA
- Record Retention
- Workplace Politics
- Business Insurance
- Employment Discrimination Laws
- Hiring and Firing
- Kentucky Labor Cabinet
- Salary Threshold
- Unemployment Benefits
- Workplace Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Employee Contracts
- Internet & Media Law
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
- USERRA
Showing 1 post from 2025.
SCOTUS Opens the Door to “Reverse” Discrimination
Posted In Employment Discrimination Laws, Employment Law, SCOTUS, Workplace Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
Employers expecting good news from a largely pro-employer Supreme Court have just been dealt an unexpected headache. In a rare unanimous opinion, the United States Supreme Court opened the door a little further to claims of “reverse” discrimination in the case of Ames V. Ohio Department of Youth Services. The Court removed the requirement that plaintiffs claiming reverse discrimination must prove their claims with additional background circumstances that were not required for a traditional discrimination claim. More >

