Contact Us
Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Join us on LinkedInCategories
- SCOTUS
- Overtime
- Overtime Rule
- Federal Trade Commission
- FTC
- Service Animals
- Remote Work
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Minors
- Work from Home
- Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
- COVID-19
- Workplace health
- Intellectual Property
- Trade Secrets
- Worker Misclassification
- FMLA Retaliation
- Non-exempt employees
- Wage and Hour
- ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (“ADAAA”)
- Adverse Employment Action
- Civil Rights
- Compliance
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- EEOC
- Employee Handbook
- Employee Misconduct
- Employment Law
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- Independent Contractors
- National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- Social Media
- Social Media Policies
- Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
- U.S. Department of Labor
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”)
- Union
- Employer Group Health Plans
- HIPAA
- Telecommuting
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Employee Training
- Federal Department of Labor
- Kentucky Wage and Hour Act
- At-will employment
- Criminal Background Checks
- Employee Benefits
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Government employees
- Litigation
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Online Defamation
- Paid Time Off ("PTO")
- Payroll
- Pension Plans
- Reference checks
- Severance Pay
- Supervisor
- Tangible employment actions
- Title VII retaliation cases
- Crisis Management
- Employment Practices Liability Insurance
- OSHA
- Record Retention
- Workplace Politics
- Business Insurance
- Employment Discrimination Laws
- Hiring and Firing
- Kentucky Labor Cabinet
- Salary Threshold
- Unemployment Benefits
- Workplace Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Employee Contracts
- Internet & Media Law
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
- USERRA
Showing 2 posts in U.S. Supreme Court.
Supreme Court Remodels Title VII Religious Accommodations in Groff v. DeJoy
For nearly 50 years, the common test of religious accommodation from the Hardison v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. case was that, if a religious accommodation required more than a de minimis cost, it was asking too much of an employer under Title VII. In Groff v. DeJoy, the Supreme Court of the United States decided that this standard needs a reset, and employers may be in for a few changes. More >
U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Amazon Worker Security Screening Case is Clear Victory for Employers
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously against workers who had sued the agency that provided temporary staffing for Amazon warehouses in Nevada seeking compensation for time spent waiting to go through security screening at the end of the workday. The workers alleged that such screenings could take up to 30 minutes. Amazon disagreed, contending that “employees typically walk through security with little or no wait, and Amazon has a global process that ensures the time employees spend waiting in security is less than 90 seconds.” More >
