Contact Us
Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Join us on LinkedInCategories
- Part 2
- Data Privacy
- Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights
- Medical Malpractice
- Medical Cannabis
- Workplace health
- Workplace Violence
- Assisted Living Facilities
- EMTALA
- FDA
- Reproductive Rights
- Roe v. Wade
- SCOTUS
- COVID-19
- Prescription Drugs
- Telemedicine
- Medical Spas
- Code Enforcement
- Corporate
- United States Department of Justice ("DOJ")
- Employee Contracts
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Compliance
- HIPAA
- Kentucky Board of Nursing
- Managed Care Organizations (“MCOs”)
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- False Claims Act
- KASPER
- Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
- Kentucky’s Department for Medicaid Services
- Medicaid
- Mental Health Care
- Office for Civil Rights ("OCR")
- Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG)
- Physician Assistants
- Primary Care Physicians ("PCPs")
- Qui Tam
- Stark Laws
- Accountable Care Organizations (“ACO”)
- Affordable Care Act
- APRNs
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Charitable Hospitals
- Data Breach
- Electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI)
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”)
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("HPSA")
- Hospitals
- HPSA
- HRSA
- Medicare
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”)
- Pharmacists
- Rural Health Centers (“RHCs”)
- Rural Health Clinic
- Telehealth
- Business Associate Agreements
- Compliance Programs
- Fraud
- Hospice
- Overpayments
- Part D
- Appeal
- Electronic Health Records (“EHR")
- ERISA
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Business Associates
- Denied Claims
- Division of Regulated Child Care
- Employee Agreement
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Licensed practical nurses (LPN)
- Licensure Requirements
- Nurse practitioners (NP)
- Part A
- Part B
- Patient Autonomy
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Service Entities
- Physician Payments
- Qualified Health Plan ("QHP")
- Registered nurses (RN)
- Abuse and Waste
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare Regulation
- Health Care Law
McBrayer Blogs
Showing 3 posts from 2024.
What Kentucky Health Facilities Need to Know about Workplace Safety
Healthcare workplace violence is a recognized hazard in the healthcare industry. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in 2018 that approximately 73% of all nonfatal workplace violence injuries involved healthcare workers.[1] Even then, the incidence of workplace violence is likely higher due to underreporting.[2] Combined with the increased stress, isolation for patients and providers, and continued staffing issues and burnout, workplace violence has become one of the main contributors for healthcare workers to leave the field.[3]
Updates and Modernization of Kentucky's Assisted Living Legal Framework
Since 2022, Kentucky's assisted living community regulations have undergone significant updates. The recent updates to Kentucky’s assisted living community laws and regulations enhance resident safety and improve the communities that support them. Although Senate Bill (SB) 11 passed in 2022, as is often the case with complex regulatory frameworks, the applicable regulations were promulgated and enacted well into the end of 2023. More >
Recent Supreme Court Decisions and the Impact on Reproductive Rights
Recent United States Supreme Court decisions have delivered small temporary wins for reproductive rights. A unanimous Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the FDA’s rule for prescribing and dispensing abortion pills. On June 13, 2024, a unanimous court decided in Food and Drug Administration v Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine that the anti-abortion doctors and medical groups that challenged the expansion of access to mifepristone, one of the two drugs used in medical abortions, lacked standing. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court, acknowledged the challengers’ “sincere legal, moral, ideological, and policy objections” to elective abortion and to the FDA’s changes to the conditions on the use of mifepristone. However, the challengers to the FDA regulation failed to show how they had been harmed, as they do not themselves prescribe the medication. The court further found that merely objecting to abortion and to the FDA’s policies are not enough to establish standing and bring a case to federal court. The challengers contended that having to treat patients who suffered complications from using the drug is a harm to them and similarly convicted providers in other respects, such as diverting resources, increasing the likelihood of lawsuits, and increasing insurance costs. Justice Kavanaugh continued to describe the speculative nature of the challengers’ attempt to establish standing. If the challengers could sue with this theory, it could open a dangerous door to challenge “almost any policy affecting public health.” More >
