Contact Us
Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Join us on LinkedInCategories
- SB 150
- COVID-19
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- KBML
- medication assisted therapy
- Acute Care Beds
- Clinical Support
- Coronavirus
- Emergency Medical Services
- Emergency Preparedness
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Legislative Developments
- Corporate
- United States Department of Justice ("DOJ")
- Employee Contracts
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Opioid Epidemic
- Sexual Harassment
- Health Resource and Services Administration
- Litigation
- Medical Malpractice
- House Bill 333
- Senate Bill 79
- locum tenens
- Senate Bill 4
- Physician Prescribing Authority
- Chronic Pain Management
- HIPAA
- Prescription Drugs
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Uncategorized
- "Two Midnights Rule"
- 340B Program
- EHR Systems
- Hospice
- Skilled Nursing Facilities (“SNFs”)
- ICD-10
- Primary Care Physicians ("PCPs")
- Electronic Health Records (“EHR")
- Drug Screening
- Urinalysis
- KASPER
- Mental Health Care
- Affordable Insurance Exchanges
- Fraud
- Health Care Fraud
- HIPAA Risk Assessment
- Office for Civil Rights ("OCR")
- Qui Tam
- Stark Laws
- Compliance
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
- Kentucky’s Department for Medicaid Services
- Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG)
- Physician Assistants
- Accountable Care Organizations (“ACO”)
- Certificate of Need ("CON")
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”)
- Fee for Service
- HPSA
- Part D
- Pharmacists
- Rural Health Centers (“RHCs”)
- Telehealth
- Affordable Care Act
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Data Breach
- Electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI)
- False Claims Act
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("HPSA")
- Hospitals
- Medicaid
- Medical Staff By-Laws
- Medically Underserved Area ("MUA")
- Medicare
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”)
- Rural Health Clinic
- Alternative Payment Models
- Charitable Hospitals
- HRSA
- Limited Services Clinics
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- American Telemedicine Association (“ATA”)
- Criminal Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”)
- Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (“HEAT”)
- Kentucky Board of Nursing
- Qualified Health Care Centers (“FQHC”)
- Telemedicine
- Hydrocodone
- APRNs
- United States ex. Rel. Kane v. Continuum Health Partners
- Webinar
- Chain and Organization System (“PECOS”)
- Jimmo v. Sebelius
- Maintenance Standard
- Overpayments
- Vitas Innovative Hospice Care
- Agreed Order
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
- Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA")
- Emergency Rooms
- Enrollment
- Hinchy v. Walgreen Co.
- Re-validation
- Chiropractic services
- Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”)
- Kentucky Senate Bill 7
- Medicare Part D
- Minors
- Ophthalmological services
- Physician Compare website
- Texting
- All-Payer Claims Database ("APCD")
- Compliance Officer
- Essential Health Benefits
- ICD-9
- 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (“PFS”)
- 501(c)(3)
- Appeal
- Chronic Care Management
- Compounding
- CPR
- Dispenser
- Drug Quality and Security Act (“DQSA”)
- HealthCare.gov
- House Bill 3204
- Kindred v. Cherolis
- Long-term care communities
- National Drug Code ("NDC")
- New England Compounding Center ("NECC")
- Outsourcing facility
- Ping v. Beverly Enterprises
- Power of Attorney ("POA")
- Prescriber
- State Health Plan
- Sustainable Growth Rate (“SGR”)
- Cadillac tax
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Community health needs assessment (“CHNA”)
- Denied Claims
- Federation of State Medical Boards (“FSMB”)
- Food and Drug Administratio
- Form 4720
- Grace Period
- Individual mandate
- Kentucky Medical Practice Act
- Kynect
- Mobile medical applications ("apps")
- Model Policy for the Appropriate Use of Social Media and Social Networking in Medical Practice (“Model Policy”)
- NADSA Conference
- National Institutes of Health
- Nonprofit hospitals
- Physician Payments
- Qualified Health Plan ("QHP")
- Social Media
- Spousal coverage
- UPS
- "Plan of Correction"
- Affinity Health Plan
- Arbitration
- Condition of Participation ("CoP")
- Daycare centers
- Department of Medicaid Services’ (“DMS”)
- Division of Regulated Child Care
- Employer Mandate
- Health Professional Shortage Areas (“HPSA”)
- Home Health Prospective Payment System
- Home Medical Equipment Providers
- Hospitalists
- Inpatient Care
- Intermediate Sanctions Agreement
- Kentucky Health Benefit Exchange
- Licensure Requirements
- LLC v. Sutter
- Long-Term Care Providers ("LTC")
- Low-utilization payment adjustment ("LUPA")
- Medicare Shared Saving Program (MSSP)
- Network provider agreement
- Nonroutine medical supplies conversion factor (“NRS”)
- Payors
- Personal Service Entities
- Physician Recruitment
- Physician shortages
- Quality reporting
- Residency Programs
- Statement of Deficiency ("SOD")
- Upcoding
- “Superuser”
- Audit
- Decertification
- Doe v. Guthrie Clinic
- EHR vendor
- Employer Group Health Plans
- ERISA
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- False Billings
- Health Reform
- Licensed practical nurses (LPN)
- List of Excluded Individuals and Entities
- Meaningful use incentives
- Medicare Administrative Coordinators
- Medicare Benefit Policy Manual
- Nurse practitioners (NP)
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (“ONC”)
- Part A
- Part B
- Provider Self Disclosure Protocol
- Registered nurses (RN)
- Self-Disclosure Protocol
- Trade Association Group Coverage
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Business Associate Agreements
- Business Associates
- Call Coverage
- Group Purchasing Organizations ("GPO")
- House Bill 104
- Kentucky House Bill 217
- Patient Autonomy
- Patient Privacy
- Personal Health Information
- Senate Bill 39
- Senate Finance Committee Report
- State Medicaid Expansion
- Autism/ASD
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Kentucky House Bill 159
- Kentucky Primary Care Centers (“PCCs”)
- Managed Care Organizations (“MCOs”)
- Compliance Programs
- Critical Access Hospitals (“CAHs”)
- Essential Health Benefits (“EHBs”)
- Medicare Audit Improvement Act of 2012
- Recovery Audit Contractors (“RAC”)
- Small Business Health Options Program (“SHOP”)
- Sunshine Act
- Abuse and Waste
- Center for Disease Control
- Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan programs (“CO-OPS”)
- Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS)
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
- Kentucky Health Care Co-Op
- Kentucky Health Cooperative (“KYHC”)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- House Bill 1
- Kentucky Pharmacists Association
- Kentucky “Pill Mill Bill”
- Employee Agreement
- Free Conference Committee Report
- Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program
- House Bill 4
- Pain Management Facilities
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare Regulation
- Health Care Law
McBrayer Blogs
Showing 4 posts from October 2015.
OIG Alert Shows Increased Concern over Data Blocking
In a report to Congress last April, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Technology addressed the growing issue of data blocking. Data blocking occurs when some person or entity knowingly and unreasonably interferes with the exchange or use of electronic health information (“EHI”), and this happens due to business incentives that cause those persons or entities to want to control and limit availability to that information. For instance, if one ACO has the capability to send EHI of a patient safely and securely to another ACO treating that patient through a certified health IT system, but instead faxes that patient’s information, it has engaged in data blocking. It has made it more difficult, inefficient and expensive for the rival ACO to treat that patient. In essence, data blocking prevents the exact purpose of the HITECH Act and provisions of the Affordable Care Act which were designed to increase interoperability of electronic health information systems and facilitate the exchange of information. These broad concerns over data blocking found footing in a recent Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) Alert stressing that data blocking can run afoul of the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute. More >
OIG Targets Questionable Billing Practices for Ambulance Services
The Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) pulled no punches in a recent report on Medicare Part B billing for ambulance transports. The September release presented a case for increased scrutiny, pointing out that Medicare has historically been vulnerable to fraud where ambulance transports are concerned. For instance, a 2006 OIG report determined that 25% of billed ambulance transports did not meet Medicare requirements in Calendar Year 2002. That year, Medicare paid almost $3 billion for ambulance services, and improper payments accounted for an estimated $402 million of that total. As 2012 saw Medicare pay $5.8 billion for ambulance services, the OIG took an even closer look at this category of claims. More >
The ICD-10 switchover: It’s here – are you prepared?
The day of reckoning is upon us – October 1st has now come and gone, and there was no other delay of ICD-10 implementation (the earliest proposed date of implementation was October 1, 2011, which was pushed back to October 1, 2013, then October 1, 2014, then the final deadline of October 1st of 2015 – there are only so many times one can press the “Snooze” button on ICD-10 implementation, apparently). The implementation of ICD-10 is in full swing, and healthcare entities that were unprepared will be feeling a significant impact if they have not begun the process. The importance of ICD-10 readiness cannot be understated, and healthcare entities that have yet to work on Phase 1 of implantation should understand that it isn’t too late to get ready for the change. More >
Primary Care Providers – Are you feeling the pinch?
It was nice while it lasted – due to a provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”), services furnished by certain primary care providers (“PCPs”) were subject to an enhanced payment rate for Calendar Years 2013 and 2014. These PCPs had to have (a) been Board certified in the specialty designation of family medicine, general internal medicine or pediatric medicine or have a subspecialty designation recognized by specific boards or associations, or (b) furnished more than 60% of claims in specific evaluation and management or vaccine administration services under certain codes to have been eligible for these enhanced payments.[1] The payments were raised to the level of the Medicare Part B fee schedule rate (unless the actual billed charge for the service was lower), and providers had until April 1, 2013 to self-attest to being eligible.[2] The increase applied to both fee-for-service and managed care Medicaid plans. More >
