Contact Us
Categories
- Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act
- Code Enforcement
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- Employment Law
- FFCRA
- CARES Act
- Nursing Home Reform Act
- SB 150
- COVID-19
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- KBML
- medication assisted therapy
- Acute Care Beds
- Clinical Support
- Coronavirus
- Emergency Medical Services
- Emergency Preparedness
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Legislative Developments
- Corporate
- United States Department of Justice ("DOJ")
- Employee Contracts
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Opioid Epidemic
- Sexual Harassment
- Health Resource and Services Administration
- Litigation
- Medical Malpractice
- House Bill 333
- Senate Bill 79
- locum tenens
- Senate Bill 4
- Physician Prescribing Authority
- Chronic Pain Management
- HIPAA
- Prescription Drugs
- "Two Midnights Rule"
- 340B Program
- Hospice
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Skilled Nursing Facilities (“SNFs”)
- Uncategorized
- EHR Systems
- ICD-10
- Primary Care Physicians ("PCPs")
- Electronic Health Records (“EHR")
- Drug Screening
- KASPER
- Mental Health Care
- Urinalysis
- Affordable Insurance Exchanges
- Fraud
- Health Care Fraud
- HIPAA Risk Assessment
- Kentucky’s Department for Medicaid Services
- Office for Civil Rights ("OCR")
- Qui Tam
- Stark Laws
- Compliance
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- HPSA
- Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
- Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG)
- Pharmacists
- Physician Assistants
- Accountable Care Organizations (“ACO”)
- Affordable Care Act
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Certificate of Need ("CON")
- Data Breach
- Electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI)
- False Claims Act
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”)
- Fee for Service
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
- Hospitals
- Medicaid
- Medical Staff By-Laws
- Medicare
- Part D
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”)
- Rural Health Centers (“RHCs”)
- Telehealth
- Alternative Payment Models
- Charitable Hospitals
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("HPSA")
- HRSA
- Limited Services Clinics
- Medically Underserved Area ("MUA")
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- Rural Health Clinic
- Kentucky Board of Nursing
- American Telemedicine Association (“ATA”)
- Criminal Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”)
- Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (“HEAT”)
- Hydrocodone
- Kentucky Pharmacists Association
- Qualified Health Care Centers (“FQHC”)
- Telemedicine
- Webinar
- APRNs
- United States ex. Rel. Kane v. Continuum Health Partners
- Agreed Order
- Chain and Organization System (“PECOS”)
- Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA")
- Hinchy v. Walgreen Co.
- Jimmo v. Sebelius
- Maintenance Standard
- Overpayments
- Vitas Innovative Hospice Care
- Chiropractic services
- Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”)
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
- Emergency Rooms
- Enrollment
- Kentucky Senate Bill 7
- Medicare Part D
- Minors
- Ophthalmological services
- Physician Compare website
- Re-validation
- Texting
- 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (“PFS”)
- All-Payer Claims Database ("APCD")
- Chronic Care Management
- Compliance Officer
- CPR
- Essential Health Benefits
- ICD-9
- Sustainable Growth Rate (“SGR”)
- 501(c)(3)
- Appeal
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Compounding
- Dispenser
- Drug Quality and Security Act (“DQSA”)
- Food and Drug Administratio
- HealthCare.gov
- House Bill 3204
- Kindred v. Cherolis
- Kynect
- Long-term care communities
- Mobile medical applications ("apps")
- National Drug Code ("NDC")
- National Institutes of Health
- New England Compounding Center ("NECC")
- Outsourcing facility
- Ping v. Beverly Enterprises
- Power of Attorney ("POA")
- Prescriber
- State Health Plan
- Affinity Health Plan
- Cadillac tax
- Community health needs assessment (“CHNA”)
- Condition of Participation ("CoP")
- Denied Claims
- Department of Medicaid Services’ (“DMS”)
- Federation of State Medical Boards (“FSMB”)
- Form 4720
- Grace Period
- Home Health Prospective Payment System
- Home Medical Equipment Providers
- Hospitalists
- Individual mandate
- Inpatient Care
- Kentucky Medical Practice Act
- Licensure Requirements
- Long-Term Care Providers ("LTC")
- Low-utilization payment adjustment ("LUPA")
- Medicare Shared Saving Program (MSSP)
- Model Policy for the Appropriate Use of Social Media and Social Networking in Medical Practice (“Model Policy”)
- Nonprofit hospitals
- Nonroutine medical supplies conversion factor (“NRS”)
- Personal Service Entities
- Physician Payments
- Qualified Health Plan ("QHP")
- Quality reporting
- Social Media
- Spousal coverage
- Upcoding
- UPS
- “Superuser”
- "Plan of Correction"
- Arbitration
- Audit
- Daycare centers
- Decertification
- Division of Regulated Child Care
- EHR vendor
- Employer Group Health Plans
- Employer Mandate
- ERISA
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- False Billings
- Health Professional Shortage Areas (“HPSA”)
- Health Reform
- Intermediate Sanctions Agreement
- Kentucky Health Benefit Exchange
- Licensed practical nurses (LPN)
- List of Excluded Individuals and Entities
- LLC v. Sutter
- Meaningful use incentives
- Medicare Administrative Coordinators
- Medicare Benefit Policy Manual
- Network provider agreement
- Nurse practitioners (NP)
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (“ONC”)
- Part A
- Part B
- Payors
- Physician Recruitment
- Physician shortages
- Provider Self Disclosure Protocol
- Registered nurses (RN)
- Residency Programs
- Self-Disclosure Protocol
- Statement of Deficiency ("SOD")
- Trade Association Group Coverage
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Business Associate Agreements
- Business Associates
- Call Coverage
- Doe v. Guthrie Clinic
- Group Purchasing Organizations ("GPO")
- House Bill 104
- Kentucky House Bill 217
- Patient Autonomy
- Patient Privacy
- Personal Health Information
- Senate Bill 39
- Senate Finance Committee Report
- State Medicaid Expansion
- Autism/ASD
- Compliance Programs
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Kentucky House Bill 159
- Kentucky Primary Care Centers (“PCCs”)
- Managed Care Organizations (“MCOs”)
- Abuse and Waste
- Center for Disease Control
- Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan programs (“CO-OPS”)
- Critical Access Hospitals (“CAHs”)
- Essential Health Benefits (“EHBs”)
- Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS)
- Kentucky Health Cooperative (“KYHC”)
- Medicare Audit Improvement Act of 2012
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Recovery Audit Contractors (“RAC”)
- Small Business Health Options Program (“SHOP”)
- Sunshine Act
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
- Kentucky Health Care Co-Op
- Kentucky “Pill Mill Bill”
- Employee Agreement
- Free Conference Committee Report
- Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program
- House Bill 1
- House Bill 4
- Pain Management Facilities
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare Regulation
- Health Care Law
McBrayer Blogs
Showing 1 post in List of Excluded Individuals and Entities.
OIG Updates Self-Disclosure Protocol, But Discourages Action, cont.
On Tuesday, the changes to eligibility and disclosure requirements for the OIG’s Self-Disclosure Protocol (“SDP”) were discussed. Now, let’s take a look at certain disclosures and what has changed from the ’98 version.
Disclosures Involving Excluded Persons
Many SDP disclosures involve violations of employing or contracting with individuals who are on OIG’s List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (“LEIE”). With the update, OIG has specified what is needed for a complete disclosure of this violation. A disclosure must include, among other things, biographical information on the excluded party, description of the disclosing party’s screening process, and a description of how the conduct was discovered. The disclosing party must also screen all current employees and contractors against the LEIE.
OIG has also provided guidance on calculating damages for this disclosure. For direct providers who bill separately, the disclosing party must provide the total amounts claimed and paid by federal health care programs for the items or services. If items or services are not billed separately, a formula will be used based on the excluded party’s total cost of employment or contracting. This amount will be multiplied by the disclosing party’s federal program payor mix.
Disclosures Involving Anti-Kickback and Stark Law
Since the 2009 Open Letter, conduct involving only potential violations of the Stark Law is not eligible for SDP. To qualify, violations must potentially involve both the AKS and Stark Law. It is the disclosing party’s responsibility to describe each disclosed arrangement and determine on their own why each arrangement may violate the AKS and, if applicable, the Stark Law.
If a disclosure is limited solely to the Stark Law, this potential violation should be disclosed to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) through their Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol (“SRDP”). Providers should be prepared for the possibility that OIG and CMS will work together.
A disclosing party must include the total remuneration provided through the agreement, but a party may explain why portions of the remuneration should not be considered by the OIG when determining the settlement amount.
Disclosures Involving False Billings
For potential improper claim disclosures, a disclosing party must estimate the total financial impact to government health care programs. To do this, a party can either disclose all claims with specific information or use a sample size. When using the latter method, a party must use a statistically valid sample of, at minimum, 100 claims and use the mean point estimate for calculating the effect. The ’98 version only required 30 claims and called for a “minimum precision level.”
The updated SDP does offer a short list of benefits for disclosing parties. Resolution will continue to occur in most matters without a corporate integrity agreement. This has been the general policy since the 2008 Open Letter. OIG will maintain its general practice to require a minimum multiplier of 1.5 times the single damages for many instances. Lastly, there will be a suspension of the obligation to report and return overpayments to the federal health care programs while the SDP is pending.
In evaluating the pros and cons of the updated SDP, the scales weigh heavily in favor of OIG and against self-disclosure. Entry into the SDP should be carefully considered. The new version offers only minor benefits while posing significant risks to a disclosing party who is seeking to come forth with potential violations.
Christopher J. Shaughnessy is a member at McBrayer law. Mr. Shaughnessy concentrates his practice area in healthcare law and is located in the firm’s Lexington office. He can be reached at cshaughnessy@mcbrayerfirm.com or at (859) 231-8780, ext. 1251.
Services may be performed by others.
This article does not constitute legal advice.