Contact Us
Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Join us on LinkedInCategories
- Data Privacy
- Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights
- Medical Malpractice
- Medical Cannabis
- Workplace health
- Workplace Violence
- Assisted Living Facilities
- EMTALA
- FDA
- Reproductive Rights
- Roe v. Wade
- SCOTUS
- COVID-19
- Prescription Drugs
- Telemedicine
- Medical Spas
- Code Enforcement
- Corporate
- United States Department of Justice ("DOJ")
- Employee Contracts
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Compliance
- HIPAA
- Kentucky Board of Nursing
- Managed Care Organizations (“MCOs”)
- Primary Care Physicians ("PCPs")
- Accountable Care Organizations (“ACO”)
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Data Breach
- Electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI)
- False Claims Act
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”)
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
- HPSA
- KASPER
- Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
- Kentucky’s Department for Medicaid Services
- Medicaid
- Medicare
- Mental Health Care
- Office for Civil Rights ("OCR")
- Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG)
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”)
- Pharmacists
- Physician Assistants
- Qui Tam
- Rural Health Centers (“RHCs”)
- Stark Laws
- Telehealth
- Affordable Care Act
- APRNs
- Charitable Hospitals
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("HPSA")
- Hospitals
- HRSA
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- Rural Health Clinic
- Business Associate Agreements
- Compliance Programs
- ERISA
- Fraud
- Hospice
- Overpayments
- Part D
- Appeal
- Denied Claims
- Electronic Health Records (“EHR")
- Physician Payments
- Qualified Health Plan ("QHP")
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Business Associates
- Division of Regulated Child Care
- Employee Agreement
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Licensed practical nurses (LPN)
- Licensure Requirements
- Nurse practitioners (NP)
- Part A
- Part B
- Patient Autonomy
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Service Entities
- Registered nurses (RN)
- Abuse and Waste
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare Regulation
- Health Care Law
McBrayer Blogs
The Unhappy Intersection of Hospital Mergers and Antitrust Laws
The rapidly-evolving field of health care has been moving lately towards a single-minded goal – coordination of patient care in the name of efficiency and efficacy. Hospital systems are more and more often merging with other medical practices to better achieve the standards and goals of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, however, recently provided a stark reminder that the ACA isn’t the only law hospitals need to consider compliance with in these mergers.
Saltzer Medical Group in Nampa, Idaho, had been seeking to make a change from fee-for-service to risk-based reimbursement and approached St. Luke’s Health System in Boise in 2012about a formal partnership. They entered into a five-year professional service agreement that contained language about wanting to move away from fee-for-service reimbursement but without any clear language on making that change. Saltzer received a $9 million payment on the deal. Other hospital systems in the area, the FTC, and the Idaho Attorney General all filed suit to enjoin the merger.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s holding that St. Luke’s violated state and federal antitrust laws when acquiring Saltzer. St. Luke’s argued that acquisition of the other provider would improve patient outcomes and care in the community of Nampa, Idaho, where Saltzer operates, but both courts agreed that the anticompetitive concerns surrounding the merger outweighed the benefits to quality care.
This case and other similar cases brought by the FTC provide a bleak outlook for health care providers looking to merge with other entities to provide care and efficiency under the aims of the ACA. While the court ultimately found that St. Luke’s aims were beneficial and not anticompetitive in and of themselves, antitrust laws only truly take the effect on competition into account, and courts are not ready to place quality of care under the ACA on equal footing.
Antitrust laws and the ACA provide a rocky path for health care practitioners to follow, but you can trust the attorneys of McBrayer to guide you.
Services may be performed by others.
This article does not constitute legal advice.
