Contact Us
Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Join us on LinkedInCategories
- SCOTUS
- Overtime
- Overtime Rule
- Federal Trade Commission
- FTC
- Service Animals
- Remote Work
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Minors
- Work from Home
- Workplace health
- Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
- COVID-19
- Intellectual Property
- Trade Secrets
- Worker Misclassification
- FMLA Retaliation
- Non-exempt employees
- Wage and Hour
- ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (“ADAAA”)
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- Employee Handbook
- Employee Misconduct
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- Social Media
- Social Media Policies
- Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
- U.S. Department of Labor
- Union
- Adverse Employment Action
- Civil Rights
- Compliance
- EEOC
- Employer Group Health Plans
- Employment Law
- HIPAA
- Independent Contractors
- Telecommuting
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”)
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Employee Training
- At-will employment
- Criminal Background Checks
- Employee Benefits
- Federal Department of Labor
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Government employees
- Kentucky Wage and Hour Act
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Online Defamation
- Paid Time Off ("PTO")
- Payroll
- Pension Plans
- Reference checks
- Severance Pay
- Employment Practices Liability Insurance
- Litigation
- OSHA
- Record Retention
- Supervisor
- Tangible employment actions
- Title VII retaliation cases
- Crisis Management
- Employment Discrimination Laws
- Hiring and Firing
- Kentucky Labor Cabinet
- Salary Threshold
- Unemployment Benefits
- Workplace Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Workplace Politics
- Business Insurance
- Employee Contracts
- Internet & Media Law
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
- USERRA
Showing 1 post tagged Title VII.
Supreme Court Remodels Title VII Religious Accommodations in Groff v. DeJoy
Posted In Employment Discrimination Laws, Employment Law, Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, U.S. Supreme Court
For nearly 50 years, the common test of religious accommodation from the Hardison v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. case was that, if a religious accommodation required more than a de minimis cost, it was asking too much of an employer under Title VII. In Groff v. DeJoy, the Supreme Court of the United States decided that this standard needs a reset, and employers may be in for a few changes. More >
