Contact Us
Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Join us on LinkedInCategories
- Part 2
- Data Privacy
- Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights
- Medical Malpractice
- Medical Cannabis
- Workplace health
- Workplace Violence
- Assisted Living Facilities
- EMTALA
- FDA
- Reproductive Rights
- Roe v. Wade
- SCOTUS
- COVID-19
- Prescription Drugs
- Telemedicine
- Medical Spas
- Code Enforcement
- Corporate
- United States Department of Justice ("DOJ")
- Employee Contracts
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Compliance
- HIPAA
- Kentucky Board of Nursing
- Managed Care Organizations (“MCOs”)
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- False Claims Act
- KASPER
- Kentucky’s Department for Medicaid Services
- Medicaid
- Mental Health Care
- Office for Civil Rights ("OCR")
- Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG)
- Primary Care Physicians ("PCPs")
- Qui Tam
- Stark Laws
- Accountable Care Organizations (“ACO”)
- Affordable Care Act
- APRNs
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Charitable Hospitals
- Data Breach
- Electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI)
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”)
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("HPSA")
- Hospitals
- HPSA
- HRSA
- Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
- Medicare
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”)
- Pharmacists
- Physician Assistants
- Rural Health Centers (“RHCs”)
- Rural Health Clinic
- Telehealth
- Business Associate Agreements
- Fraud
- Part D
- Appeal
- Compliance Programs
- Electronic Health Records (“EHR")
- ERISA
- Hospice
- Overpayments
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Business Associates
- Denied Claims
- Division of Regulated Child Care
- Employee Agreement
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Licensed practical nurses (LPN)
- Licensure Requirements
- Nurse practitioners (NP)
- Part A
- Part B
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Service Entities
- Physician Payments
- Qualified Health Plan ("QHP")
- Registered nurses (RN)
- Abuse and Waste
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Patient Autonomy
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare Regulation
- Health Care Law
McBrayer Blogs
Showing 21 posts in Medicaid.
Tips for New Enrollment & Revalidation for Participation in Medicare & Medicaid
The new enrollment and revalidation requirements for providers and suppliers for Medicare/Medicaid participation was previously detailed on this blog. As promised as a follow-up, this blog post will describe enrollment best practices and tips for ensuring that enrollment or revalidation is properly accomplished. Not only is initial enrollment now more onerous, but revalidation is required for all physicians and other providers/suppliers who were enrolled before March 25, 2011, which generally means that all physicians and physician groups must complete the re-enrollment process. A failure to re-enroll means that CMS will de-activate payment until a successful re-enrollment process is completed. In some cases, CMS may even revoke participation. Thus, it is crucial that physicians, providers, and suppliers get it right the first time. More >
An Unlikely Consequence, cont.
On Tuesday, I discussed the recent trend of hospital layoffs of staff, administrative and professional alike, in order to reduce costs despite expectations of an unprecedented number of individuals seeking health care services under the ACA. More >
The Pioneer Program Report Card
In 2012, thirty-two organizations were selected to participate as “Pioneers” in a pilot Accountable Care Organization (“ACO”) program created through the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). The program’s goals were to revolutionize the health system and reduce medical costs by basing physician and hospital pay on quality rather than quantity. More >
Reforming Medicare Audits
On October 16, 2012, the Medicare Audit Improvement Act of 2012[1] was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Representative Sam Graves. The purpose of this legislation is to reform the Medicare auditing program. This legislation aims to improve the accuracy and transparency of Medicare audits of hospitals as well as increase the accountability of Recovery Audit Contractors (“RAC”).[2] More >
Guess Who’s Coming to Visit? Long-Term Care Facility Inspections
Compliance and preparedness are two very real, everyday concerns for long-term care facilities. Not only are these important aspects of daily operations for the safety of the employees and patients, they are paramount because any day a visitor from the Office of the Inspector General (OIG”) or Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) could show up for an inspection. Is your facility prepared? More >
Compliance Plan – A Provider’s Defense
The Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) has always encouraged Medicare and Medicaid providers to implement a compliance program. For 14 years, as a matter of fact, OIG has provided compliance guidance in 11 healthcare sectors (including: hospitals, nursing facilities, home healthcare, hospice and third-party billers). With the passing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), compliance plans and programs are now mandatory for any provider enrolled in a Federal health care program, including Medicare. More >
Accountable Care Organizations Program Models
The Supreme Court’s decision upholding the Affordable Care Act supports The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) different programs for the development of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). In Kentucky, we are beginning to see these organizations emerge in different models. More >
Federal Medicaid Opt-Out Effect on Hospitals
The mandatory expansion of Medicaid was an important element of the Affordable Care Act as providing health care benefits to uninsured was intended to achieve equity. The expansion of Medicaid rolls was also intended to reduce the cost of providing care for the uninsured and the need for disproportionate share hospital funding, which is an adjustment to account for the needs of hospitals serving a large number of low-income patients. With the ability to opt out of the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of Medicaid eligibility (read more: The Federal Medicaid Apple: Poison or the Cure?), the opt-out states may create financial problems for hospitals that depend on disproportionate share payments to cover part of their costs for providing non-reimbursed services to the indigent and uninsured. The Affordable Care Act’s decrease in disproportionate share payments to hospitals is not changed by the Supreme Court’s ruling. More >
The Federal Medicaid Apple: Poison or the Cure?
As the uncertainty about healthcare reform was extinguished by the Supreme Court in its 5-4 decision upholding the Affordable Care Act, with the provision that the Department of Health and Human Services may not withhold Medicaid funding from states that refuse to adopt the Medicaid expansion, all states, including Kentucky, now have important decisions to make about expansion of Medicaid to a projected 22.3 million uninsured eligible individuals. Under the Affordable Care Act, the federal government will pay the full cost of covering the newly eligible Medicaid participants for three years from 2014 to 2016. Thereafter the federal share will gradually decline until it reaches 90% in 2020. For traditional Medicaid, the federal government now pays, on average, about 57% of a state’s total Medicaid costs. With 826,941 Kentucky Medicaid beneficiaries in January 2012, and an additional 290,000 individuals that would be covered under the expansion, Governor Steve Beshear has announced that he is studying the issues and the costs. More >
HOSPITAL PAYMENT FOR PERFORMANCE: DRIVEN BY PHYSICIAN’S QUALITY
As the fate of the Affordable Care Act is being determined by a divisive Supreme Court, the health care industry is being led or possibly dragged by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) into new payment systems that focus on quality of care, outcomes and individual provider performance rather than the traditional fee for service payment model. Even if the Supreme Court finds the Affordable Care Act to be unconstitutional, the change from a payment system focused upon individual services to payment focused upon the quality of the care and patient outcomes are being woven into the fabric of the Medicare reimbursement system. While change in the system is assured, whether the new models will actually bring about better and more efficient care or just reduce available reimbursement is unknown. Despite the unknown effect of paying for performance based upon quality, CMS is marching on with new programs and payment penalties. Physicians, whether employed by a hospital or in a private practice, should be aware of how quality is beginning to drive hospital reimbursement as well as the importance of the physician’s role in determining the quality of care provided by hospitals. By 2017, 6% of all DRG payments will be subject to quality measures through new CMS payment programs for hospital readmissions, value based purchasing and hospital acquired conditions. With these new programs determining a significant amount of payment, physicians must understand the programs and direct their services accordingly. Likewise, hospitals must develop ways to compensate physicians for providing high quality care in a manner that allows hospitals to earn performance payments. More >
