Contact Us
Categories
- Center for Disease Control
- Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
- FFCRA
- Opioid Epidemic
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- COVID-19
- Temporary Leave
- IRS
- Treasury
- Paid Sick Leave
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act
- H.R.6201
- Health Care Law
- Coronavirus
- Worker Misclassification
- Labor Law
- Overtime
- Salary Theshold
- Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission
- Sexual Harassment
- FMLA Retaliation
- overtime rule
- Employer Wellness Programs
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Wage and Hour
- Employment Non-Discrimination Act ("ENDA")
- Paid Time Off ("PTO")
- Sick Employees
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Discrimination Laws
- ERISA
- Human Resource Department
- Independent Contractors
- OSHA
- Kentucky Civil Rights Act (“KCRA”)
- Overtime Pay
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Social Media
- Social Media Policies
- U.S. Department of Labor
- Union
- ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (“ADAAA”)
- Adverse Employment Action
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Civil Rights
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- EEOC
- Employee Handbook
- Employee Misconduct
- Employment Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”)
- Uncategorized
- Young v. UPS
- Bring Your Own Device
- BYOD
- Compliance
- copyright
- Intellectual Property
- Volunteer
- Work for Hire
- Amazon
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947
- Security Screening
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Federal contractors
- Security Checks
- Kentucky Labor Cabinet’s Occupational Safety and Health Program (KOSH)
- Micro-unit
- Specialty Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center of Mobile
- Creech v. Brown
- Lane v. Franks
- Cloud
- EEOC v. Hill Country Farms
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kaplan Higher Education Corp.
- Non-exempt employees
- Mine Safety and Health Administration ("MSHA")
- Northwestern
- Shazor v. Prof’l Transit Mgmt.
- Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
- Whistleblower
- "Ban-the-box"
- Crystalline Silica
- Drug-Free Workplaces
- Illness and Injury Reports
- Job applications
- Kentucky Department of Workers’ Claims
- Kentucky Wage and Hour Act
- Permissible Exposure Level ("PEL")
- Senate Bill 157
- WorkSmart Kentucky
- 2013)
- Berrier v. Bizer
- Bullying
- Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
- Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
- Companionship services
- Compensatory time off
- Conestoga Woods Specialties v. Sebelius
- Consumer Credit Protection Act (“CCPA”)
- Davis-Bacon and Related Acts
- Earnings
- Ehling v. Monmouth-Ocean Hospital Service Corp.
- Federal Stored Communications Act (“SCA”)
- Government employees
- Government shutdown
- Home Health Care Workers
- Jury duty
- Maternity Leave
- McNamara O’Hara Service Contract Act
- NFL Bullying Scandal
- Payroll
- Private employers
- Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores
- Small Business Administration (SBA)
- Violence
- Wage garnishment
- At-will employment
- Chenzira v. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
- COBRA
- Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”)
- EEOC v. Fabricut
- EEOC v. The Founders Pavilion
- Employee of the Month Programs
- Giant Food LLC
- Health-Contingent Wellness Programs
- HIPAA
- KYSHRM 2013
- Mandatory vaccination policies
- Medical Exams
- Participatory Wellness Programs
- Pennington v. Wagner’s Pharmacy
- Pension Plans
- Reference checks
- SHRM
- United States v. Windsor
- Defamation
- Employee Hazards
- Employee Training
- Employer Group Health Plans
- Endorsements
- Federal Workplace Agencies
- Freedom of Speech
- Madry v. Gibraltar National Corporation
- Megivern v. Glacier Hills Incorporated
- Motivating Factor
- Obesity
- Online Account Protection
- Online Defamation
- Sequester
- Social Media Ownership
- Supervisor
- Tangible employment actions
- Title VII retaliation cases
- Troyer v. T.John.E Productions
- Unfair Labor Practice
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar
- Vance v. Ball State University
- Contraceptive Mandate
- Employee Arrests
- Employee Forms
- Employee photographs
- Employer Mandate
- Employment Practices Liability Insurance
- FICA
- Form I-9
- Gatto v. United Airlines and allied Aviation Services
- House Labor and Industry Committee
- KRS 391.170
- Litigation
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- Play or Pay
- posting requirements
- Record Retention
- Religious Employer
- Right to Work Bill
- severance pay
- Supplemental Unemployment Compensation Benefits
- tax refund
- Telecommuting
- U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
- United States v. Quality Stores
- Kentucky’s Whistleblower Act
- Municipal Liability
- Public Sector Liability
- White v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corp.
- Wilson v. City of Central City
- Crisis Management
- Job Description
- Job Requirement
- Labor and Pensions ("HELP")
- PhoneDog v. Kravitz
- social privacy laws
- Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP)
- Workplace Politics
- Federal Department of Labor
- Kentucky Labor Cabinet
- Social Networking Online Protection Act (SNOP)
- Class Action Waivers
- Criminal Background Checks
- Employee Performance Reviews
- Employee Personnel Files
- Federal Arbitration Act (FAA)
- Hiring and Firing
- Informal Discussion Letter (“EEOC Letter”)
- Retaliation by Association
- Unemployment Benefits
- Workplace Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Business Insurance
- Communications Decency Act
- Employee Contracts
- Hosanna-Tabor Opinion
- Insurance Coverage
- Internet & Media Law
- Internet Defamation
- National Labor Relations Act
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
- USERRA
Foul on the Play: When Bullying in the Workplace Is Real
When Miami Dolphins player Jonathan Martin made allegations that veteran teammate Richie Incognito had bullied and hazed him so badly that he had no choice but to leave the team, the NFL was collectively stunned. Bullying in professional football? Can such a thing exist?
While the investigation is ongoing, it has been reported that Incognito used racial slurs and physically threatened Martin. While it may not be a surprise that the Dolphins’ locker room atmosphere was not exactly politically correct, what was surprising was how Dolphins’ management reacted to allegations of the bullying once it was reported.
A NFL locker room may be an extreme example of a workplace atmosphere that breeds and encourages bully behavior, but the unfortunate truth is that many work environments embrace the concept of “breaking in” or “toughening up” new employees. Management must be the first line of defense against this mindset. News reports have stated that when the Dolphins’ General Manager became aware of the bullying, he told Martin to deal with the problem by physically attacking Incognito. Responding to a bully with violence? Not the best advice. Here are some better ways managers and supervisors can create a harassment-free workplace:
(1) Review and revise your policies.
Your employer handbook may already ban harassment or retaliation, but the protected individuals under these policies may be specific classes of people (such as women or the physically disabled) that are typically offered legal protection from discrimination. Anti-bully policies should protect everyone and encompass a broad range of conduct. For instance, if a man in his 30’s is being bullied at work, what protection is he afforded? Very little. An anti-bullying policy can define unacceptable behavior and offer a means of redress to anyone who falls victim to a bully.
(2) Establish a well-known reporting procedure.
Some media sources say Martin did not file a formal complaint about the harassment before his departure because he was afraid of retaliation by his teammates. This might be true, considering that many Dolphins players (and others) have sided with Incognito – claiming that experiences like Martin’s are just part of the game and team camaraderie.
All workplaces should have a safe, confidential procedure for reporting any type of detrimental or disturbing employee conduct. Because people are so often afraid to turn to their immediate supervisor or manager with instances of bullying or harassment (in fear of retaliation), there should be more than one person whom they can report to. Furthermore, by having various individuals capable of handling complaints, a complainant has a second option if the first person he or she reports to is complacent (or, even worse, recommends physical violence).
(3) Investigate all reported incidents.
Isolated incidents of bullying or harassment may seem like nothing more than harmless pranks or jokes. However, in the event a lawsuit is filed by the complainant, the overall work atmosphere will be called into question. Is there a history of abuse? Is it happening to more than one person, but others are afraid to report it? A thorough, unbiased investigation may lead to evidence of more than a singular event.
(4) Practice what you preach.
A provision about bullying in the company handbook, while important, is not enough to change an office environment. Employees of all ranks should regularly undergo workplace training on bullying and harassment. If the reported bullying did occur in the Dolphins’ locker room, then teammates obviously witnessed it and did nothing. This is as much as a problem as was the general manager’s advice. Every employee, no matter how high or low on the organizational chart, should feel comfortable not only reporting instances of abuse when it happens to them, but also when it happens to others.
If a NFL offensive tackle can be subject to such harsh bullying that he walks away from the league, then bullying can happen to anyone, anywhere. Management’s top priority should always be ensuring that a safe, efficient workplace exists. When there’s a bully in the midst, neither of those goals can be achieved.
Stephen G. Amato is a member of McBrayer Law and is located in the firm’s Lexington office. Mr. Amato focuses his practice on civil litigation with an emphasis in all areas of labor and employment law. Employment-related issues with which Mr. Amato has particular experience include the enforcement of no-compete agreements, the investigation and defense of discrimination claims, and the negotiation and enforcement of severance agreements. He can be reached at samato@mcbrayerfirm.com or (859) 231-8780, ext. 1104.
Services may be performed by others.
This article does not constitute legal advice.