Contact Us
Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Join us on LinkedInCategories
- SCOTUS
- Overtime
- Overtime Rule
- Federal Trade Commission
- FTC
- Service Animals
- Remote Work
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Minors
- Work from Home
- Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
- COVID-19
- Workplace health
- Intellectual Property
- Trade Secrets
- Worker Misclassification
- FMLA Retaliation
- Non-exempt employees
- Wage and Hour
- ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (“ADAAA”)
- Adverse Employment Action
- Civil Rights
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- EEOC
- Employee Handbook
- Employee Misconduct
- Employment Law
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- Social Media
- Social Media Policies
- Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
- U.S. Department of Labor
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”)
- Union
- Compliance
- Employer Group Health Plans
- HIPAA
- Independent Contractors
- Telecommuting
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Employee Training
- Federal Department of Labor
- Kentucky Wage and Hour Act
- At-will employment
- Criminal Background Checks
- Employee Benefits
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Government employees
- Litigation
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Online Defamation
- Paid Time Off ("PTO")
- Payroll
- Pension Plans
- Reference checks
- Severance Pay
- Supervisor
- Tangible employment actions
- Title VII retaliation cases
- Employment Practices Liability Insurance
- OSHA
- Record Retention
- Crisis Management
- Employment Discrimination Laws
- Hiring and Firing
- Kentucky Labor Cabinet
- Salary Threshold
- Unemployment Benefits
- Workplace Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Workplace Politics
- Business Insurance
- Employee Contracts
- Internet & Media Law
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
- USERRA
Showing 1 post tagged cat's paw liability.
FMLA Retaliation in a Cat's Paw
FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act) retaliation law expanded in 2017 – about the size of a cat’s paw, which, in this instance, is pretty big. “Cat’s paw” here describes a situation where someone other than an employment decision-maker convinces (or dupes) the decision-maker to take an adverse employment action against another employee. (For those unfamiliar with the phrase, “cat’s paw” is derived from a fable wherein a monkey tricks a cat into pulling roasted chestnuts out of a fire for it to eat, burning the cat’s paws in the process. The phrase is used to describe situations where one person is unwittingly used by another for the other’s purposes.) When this is done with retaliatory intent, is the employer then liable under FMLA for retaliation? The answer, according to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (this federal circuit covers Kentucky), is “yes” in the case of Marshall v. Rawlings. More >
