Contact Us
Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Join us on LinkedInCategories
- Workplace health
- Trade Secrets
- Corporate
- Center for Disease Control
- Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
- FFCRA
- Opioid Epidemic
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- COVID-19
- IRS
- Temporary Leave
- Treasury
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act
- H.R.6201
- Health Care Law
- Paid Sick Leave
- Coronavirus
- Worker Misclassification
- Labor Law
- Overtime
- Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission
- Sexual Harassment
- FMLA Retaliation
- overtime rule
- Employer Wellness Programs
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Employment Non-Discrimination Act ("ENDA")
- Independent Contractors
- Paid Time Off ("PTO")
- Sick Employees
- Wage and Hour
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Discrimination Laws
- ERISA
- Human Resource Department
- OSHA
- Overtime Pay
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Kentucky Civil Rights Act (“KCRA”)
- Social Media
- Social Media Policies
- U.S. Department of Labor
- Union
- ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (“ADAAA”)
- Adverse Employment Action
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Civil Rights
- Compliance
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- EEOC
- Employee Handbook
- Employee Misconduct
- Employment Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”)
- Uncategorized
- Volunteer
- Young v. UPS
- Amazon
- Bring Your Own Device
- BYOD
- copyright
- Intellectual Property
- Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947
- Security Screening
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Work for Hire
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Federal contractors
- Security Checks
- Kentucky Labor Cabinet’s Occupational Safety and Health Program (KOSH)
- Micro-unit
- Specialty Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center of Mobile
- Cloud
- Creech v. Brown
- EEOC v. Hill Country Farms
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kaplan Higher Education Corp.
- Lane v. Franks
- Non-exempt employees
- Mine Safety and Health Administration ("MSHA")
- Northwestern
- Shazor v. Prof’l Transit Mgmt.
- Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
- Whistleblower
- "Ban-the-box"
- Bullying
- Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
- Compensatory time off
- Conestoga Woods Specialties v. Sebelius
- Consumer Credit Protection Act (“CCPA”)
- Crystalline Silica
- Davis-Bacon and Related Acts
- Drug-Free Workplaces
- Earnings
- Illness and Injury Reports
- Job applications
- Kentucky Department of Workers’ Claims
- Kentucky Wage and Hour Act
- McNamara O’Hara Service Contract Act
- NFL Bullying Scandal
- Payroll
- Permissible Exposure Level ("PEL")
- Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores
- Senate Bill 157
- Violence
- Wage garnishment
- WorkSmart Kentucky
- 2013)
- At-will employment
- Berrier v. Bizer
- Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
- Chenzira v. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
- Companionship services
- EEOC v. Fabricut
- EEOC v. The Founders Pavilion
- Ehling v. Monmouth-Ocean Hospital Service Corp.
- Federal Stored Communications Act (“SCA”)
- Giant Food LLC
- Government employees
- Government shutdown
- Home Health Care Workers
- Jury duty
- KYSHRM 2013
- Mandatory vaccination policies
- Maternity Leave
- Medical Exams
- Private employers
- SHRM
- Small Business Administration (SBA)
- COBRA
- Defamation
- Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”)
- Employee Hazards
- Employee of the Month Programs
- Employee Training
- Endorsements
- Federal Workplace Agencies
- Freedom of Speech
- Health-Contingent Wellness Programs
- HIPAA
- Madry v. Gibraltar National Corporation
- Megivern v. Glacier Hills Incorporated
- Motivating Factor
- Obesity
- Online Defamation
- Participatory Wellness Programs
- Pennington v. Wagner’s Pharmacy
- Pension Plans
- Reference checks
- Sequester
- Social Media Ownership
- Supervisor
- Tangible employment actions
- Title VII retaliation cases
- Troyer v. T.John.E Productions
- Unfair Labor Practice
- United States v. Windsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar
- Vance v. Ball State University
- Contraceptive Mandate
- Employee Arrests
- Employee Forms
- Employee photographs
- Employer Group Health Plans
- Employer Mandate
- Employment Practices Liability Insurance
- FICA
- Form I-9
- Gatto v. United Airlines and allied Aviation Services
- House Labor and Industry Committee
- KRS 391.170
- Litigation
- Online Account Protection
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- Play or Pay
- posting requirements
- Record Retention
- Religious Employer
- Right to Work Bill
- severance pay
- Supplemental Unemployment Compensation Benefits
- tax refund
- Telecommuting
- U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
- United States v. Quality Stores
- White v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corp.
- Job Description
- Job Requirement
- Kentucky’s Whistleblower Act
- Municipal Liability
- Public Sector Liability
- Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP)
- Wilson v. City of Central City
- Crisis Management
- Federal Department of Labor
- Kentucky Labor Cabinet
- Labor and Pensions ("HELP")
- PhoneDog v. Kravitz
- Social Networking Online Protection Act (SNOP)
- social privacy laws
- Workplace Politics
- Class Action Waivers
- Criminal Background Checks
- Employee Performance Reviews
- Employee Personnel Files
- Federal Arbitration Act (FAA)
- Hiring and Firing
- Informal Discussion Letter (“EEOC Letter”)
- Salary Threshold
- Unemployment Benefits
- Workplace Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Business Insurance
- Communications Decency Act
- Employee Contracts
- Hosanna-Tabor Opinion
- Insurance Coverage
- Internet & Media Law
- Internet Defamation
- National Labor Relations Act
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Retaliation by Association
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
- USERRA
What Employers Should Know About Bringing Employees Back into the Workplace, Part II
Posted In COVID-19, Employment Law
In our first set of guidance on reopening workplaces, we focused on basics of providing a safe working environment, compliance with ADA accommodations, and the next practical steps employers should begin to take. Since then, the EEOC has published updated guidance and an FAQ, and Gov. Beshear has provided guidance on the “Healthy at Work” initiative to begin a phased reopening of the Kentucky business community. Businesses and employers must pay close attention to these forms of guidance in getting back to the new normal.
“Healthy at Work”
The Beshear Administration released a plan for a phased reopening of Kentucky businesses. The first phase of this plan is a state readiness evaluation based on certain benchmarks:
● 14 days of decreasing cases
● Increased testing capacity and contact tracing
● Personal protective equipment (PPE) availability
● Ability to protect at-risk populations
● Ability to social distance and follow the CDC's guidelines on large gatherings
● Preparedness for possible future spike
● Status of vaccine and treatment
The first phase also allows for some healthcare providers to begin providing non-emergency services again, based on their ability to meet guidelines to contain the spread of COVID-19.
Once the initial benchmarks have been met to the Beshear administration’s satisfaction, Phase 2 will begin to see a slow reopening of certain sectors of business, based upon their ability to reopen safely. The administration is now seeking proposals from industry groups, trade associations and individual businesses for how they may plan on reopening safely. While businesses are not required to submit these proposals to reopen when that particular business sector is authorized to reopen, businesses and related groups are encouraged to submit these proposals now.
EEOC Guidance and the ADA
In April, the EEOC began compiling guidance on how businesses should comply with various antidiscrimination laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act. The full guidance is here, but some of the most relevant items for employee return are summarized below.
Employers may screen employees on return to work. Employers may make disability-related inquiries and conduct medical exams if they’re job-related and consistent with business necessity. This standard is met if the exams/inquiries are necessary to exclude employees with a medical condition that would pose a direct threat to the health or safety of others in the workplace. Employers should consult guidance from the CDC or other public health authorities to determine if employees with COVID-19 constitute such a direct threat but the EEOC has stated unequivocally that an employer may choose to administer COVID-19 testing to employees before they enter the workplace to determine if they have the virus.
Employers are also allowed to take the temperatures of employees to see if they have a fever, one of the measurable means of determining a possible COVID-19 infection. Employers must exercise care with respect to any such temperature readings because those are considered medical records and there are legal restrictions that go along with such records. Employers should note that employees without a fever may still be carriers for COVID-19.
Employers may also conduct interview prior to entry of workplace facilities by asking employees if they feel any symptoms or if they’ve been in contact with affected individuals.
The New Normal
Reopening businesses will be an unprecedented challenge, and employers are going to face a barrage of new requirements and regulations to protect workplace health and safety in the face of COVID-19. The EEOC guidance provides at least some guidelines on how employers may bring employees back in a safe manner while avoiding discrimination issues, but there are no one-size-fits-all solutions. For help in reopening the doors to your business in a safe and compliant manner, contact the COVID-19 Response Team at McBrayer for assistance.
Cynthia L. Effinger, Member with McBrayer, is located in the firm’s Louisville office. Ms. Effinger’s practice is concentrated in the areas of employment law and commercial litigation. Her employment law practice is focused on drafting employment manuals and policies, social media, wage and hour, non-compete agreements and workplace discrimination. Ms. Effinger can be reached at ceffinger@mcbrayerfirm.com or (502) 327-5400, ext. 2316.
Jaron Blandford is a member of McBrayer and is located in the firm’s Lexington office. Mr. Blandford focuses his practice on civil litigation with an emphasis in all areas of labor and employment law. He can be reached at jblandford@mcbrayerfirm.com or (859) 231-8780, ext. 1252.
Claire M. Vujanovic, member with McBrayer, is located in the firm's Louisville office. Ms. Vujanovic's practice is concentrated in the areas of labor and employment law and includes NLRA compliance, drafting and reviewing employment manuals and policies, drafting severance, non-compete and employment agreements, and counseling clients related to overtime and wage and hour regulations, laws and claims and workplace discrimination. Ms. Vujanovic can be reached at cvujanovic@mcbrayerfirm.com or (502) 327-5400, ext. 2322.
Services may be performed by others.
This article does not constitute legal advice.
